How dose the TLC359-175-RF work in the 92. There was an article done on the Lee C358-180 RF and the brass had to be trimmed to reduce the OAL so it would chamber. I see that TLC359 is. 010 less than the C358 so did that fix the OAL lingth issue.
Thanks, Jeff
TLC359-175-RF?
- Ranch Dog
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9399
- Joined: 23 Jan 2012 07:44
- Location: Inez, TX
- Has thanked: 1838 times
- Been thanked: 2281 times
Re: TLC359-175-RF?
I'm not sure Jeff as I don't own a '92 chambered in 357 Mag. I took my bullet through three revisions to enable it to chamber in the Marlin '94 without requiring the brass to be trimmed. Besides the nose length being shorter, the nose type and radius is probably more important.wvmedic wrote:How dose the TLC359-175-RF work in the 92. There was an article done on the Lee C358-180 RF and the brass had to be trimmed to reduce the OAL so it would chamber. I see that TLC359 is. 010 less than the C358 so did that fix the OAL lingth issue.
I would be surprised if the TLC359-175-RF isn't being shot in the '92. More than likely, I would here about any problems with it. The only time it hear back is if the buyer is experiencing an issue with the mold or design, there are several hundred of these molds in service and I've never had a warranty issued reported that I'm immediately aware of.
Michael
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012 12:24
Re: TLC359-175-RF?
Thanks for the info, RD. Thats why I posted here, in hopes you would chime in.
Jeff
Jeff