Who's Done a Slug/Mic Measure on an R-92 .44 Mag Barrel?
Posted: 11 Nov 2018 17:38
Here's why I ask. In addition to my R-92 in .38/.357 I have a Browning B-92 in .44 mag. I shoot nothing but handloads with cast bullets. And it took me a long time to squeeze accuracy out of it.
Most readily-available cast bullets for .44 spec/.44 mag are .430". But the groove dimension of my B-92 is .4315". My salvation was a special run of .432" 240 gr TCBB bullets that Robert Palermo (who owns Penn Bullets) ran for me. These enable the B-92 to shoot as it should -- which is almost as good as my .38/.357 R-92 shoots.
But I still wondered why Browning (Miroku) made barels that I felt were oversize. Then, just recently, I was made aware that there are two SAAMI specs for .44 mag barrels. For handguns the groove diameter is .429". But, for rifles the groove diameter is .431". Considering that I may have mis-measured by .0005", it would appear the Browning B-92 barrel is in SAAMI spec.
So, I became curious how Rossi bores and rifles .44 mag R-92 barrels. Have any of you who own these rifles made slug/mic checks?
Most readily-available cast bullets for .44 spec/.44 mag are .430". But the groove dimension of my B-92 is .4315". My salvation was a special run of .432" 240 gr TCBB bullets that Robert Palermo (who owns Penn Bullets) ran for me. These enable the B-92 to shoot as it should -- which is almost as good as my .38/.357 R-92 shoots.
But I still wondered why Browning (Miroku) made barels that I felt were oversize. Then, just recently, I was made aware that there are two SAAMI specs for .44 mag barrels. For handguns the groove diameter is .429". But, for rifles the groove diameter is .431". Considering that I may have mis-measured by .0005", it would appear the Browning B-92 barrel is in SAAMI spec.
So, I became curious how Rossi bores and rifles .44 mag R-92 barrels. Have any of you who own these rifles made slug/mic checks?