Couple of questions about a new to me 92
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 12 Feb 2021 07:44
- Location: PA
Couple of questions about a new to me 92
Recently bought an Interarms stainless saddle ring 357 with a 20" barrel. The rifle is in great shape. If it has been fired, it hasn't been fired much. I plan on just plinking with it.
One question I have concerns the serial number. It is 14xx of 2000. Is there anything special about this rifle or is it just another older 92?
The action is pretty stiff so I am going to start smoothing it up soon. I just plan on shimming the trigger spring, installing a reduced power ejector spring and polish any rough surfaces I find for now. Hopefully the weather will allow me to shoot it soon and I can decide if I want to do anything else to it.
From there, what changes will give me the best bang for the buck as far as smoothness is concerned?
TIA
One question I have concerns the serial number. It is 14xx of 2000. Is there anything special about this rifle or is it just another older 92?
The action is pretty stiff so I am going to start smoothing it up soon. I just plan on shimming the trigger spring, installing a reduced power ejector spring and polish any rough surfaces I find for now. Hopefully the weather will allow me to shoot it soon and I can decide if I want to do anything else to it.
From there, what changes will give me the best bang for the buck as far as smoothness is concerned?
TIA
- GasGuzzler
- Moderator
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: 02 Nov 2015 19:54
- Location: Cooke County, TX
- Has thanked: 310 times
- Been thanked: 451 times
Re: Couple of questions about a new to me 92
Need pics to confirm. There are about six generations of Rossi '92s. Not very many early Interarms rifles were stainless. Are sure it's the serial number you are referring to? Most times XX of XXX is separate from the serial number. My Interarms Amedeo Rossi has the serial number on the bottom of the receiver just behind the forearm and it's written laterally across from side to side.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
I've always been crazy but it's kept me from going insane.
I've always been crazy but it's kept me from going insane.
- Missionary
- Founding Member
- Posts: 588
- Joined: 21 Mar 2012 15:47
- Location: Peru
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 145 times
Re: Couple of questions about a new to me 92
Greetings
Being the happy owners of several Interarms Rossi rifles we just started operating the lever alot.
We did look inside the receivers to check for obvious leftover chips and stuff but running the lever took care of the stiffness which was not much.
I would make a couple dummy rounds before tearing it down and try things out.
Being the happy owners of several Interarms Rossi rifles we just started operating the lever alot.
We did look inside the receivers to check for obvious leftover chips and stuff but running the lever took care of the stiffness which was not much.
I would make a couple dummy rounds before tearing it down and try things out.
Way down south in Arequipa, Peru till June 2020.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 12 Feb 2021 07:44
- Location: PA
Re: Couple of questions about a new to me 92
GasGuzzler: Will try to get photos later. The serial number is stamped just as I posted it 14xx of 2000. It is on the bottom of the receiver just behind the forearm and runs lenghtwise from front to back. It is not stamped across the receiver from left to right. Also have the original box. The serial number on the box is 14xx.
Missionary: I've been working the action on this rifle also. I think it is improving. I tried feeding some 38 and 357 reloads that I have on hand. Some feed better than others. I'm sure I will have to address this when I start loading for it. You mention that your rifles weren't too stiff to begin with. Are they older or newer models? I thought I read that the newer ones were smoother.
Missionary: I've been working the action on this rifle also. I think it is improving. I tried feeding some 38 and 357 reloads that I have on hand. Some feed better than others. I'm sure I will have to address this when I start loading for it. You mention that your rifles weren't too stiff to begin with. Are they older or newer models? I thought I read that the newer ones were smoother.
- GasGuzzler
- Moderator
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: 02 Nov 2015 19:54
- Location: Cooke County, TX
- Has thanked: 310 times
- Been thanked: 451 times
Re: Couple of questions about a new to me 92
I have yet to see an actual serial number like that so I can't wait for the pictures. There are so many variables with the R92s.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
I've always been crazy but it's kept me from going insane.
I've always been crazy but it's kept me from going insane.
-
- 250 Shots
- Posts: 452
- Joined: 19 Oct 2015 01:32
- Location: Colorado
- Has thanked: 181 times
- Been thanked: 142 times
Re: Couple of questions about a new to me 92
One thing I do is shorten the hammer spring by 1/4", seems to help a lot.
-
- 2000 Shots
- Posts: 3942
- Joined: 04 Feb 2014 05:30
- Location: SoCal Loco
- Has thanked: 137 times
- Been thanked: 610 times
Re: Couple of questions about a new to me 92
Of course with a used gun that's a minimum of ~10-20+ years old it may have been tweaked even if it looks Like New and comes with the Box or in other words LNIB may not mean it is mint unmodified.rondog wrote:One thing I do is shorten the hammer spring by 1/4", seems to help a lot.
-
- 2000 Shots
- Posts: 3942
- Joined: 04 Feb 2014 05:30
- Location: SoCal Loco
- Has thanked: 137 times
- Been thanked: 610 times
Re: Couple of questions about a new to me 92
I've seen serials on some of the guns running the same direction as the receiver/barrel axis as well as running side to side. I can't specifically point to Interarms marked guns with the lengthwise serial but I think I've seen 92s from that era with serials in up to three places across the front of the receiver, along the bottom and on the lower side of the receiver. My Braztech era guns have the serial running lengthwise on the bottom of the receiver.
I do recall seeing a lot of Winchester 94s marked with the serial side to side at the front bottom of the receiver. I have at least two marked like that. It was also one of the things mentioned in the NRA takedown conversion instructions that cutting back that flange might require moving/restamping the serial to another place on the receiver. Some of the late model Win 94s, post angle eject I think, had the serial at the side of the receiver. I've got two of those but I don't recall where the ones I have are marked.
I do recall seeing a lot of Winchester 94s marked with the serial side to side at the front bottom of the receiver. I have at least two marked like that. It was also one of the things mentioned in the NRA takedown conversion instructions that cutting back that flange might require moving/restamping the serial to another place on the receiver. Some of the late model Win 94s, post angle eject I think, had the serial at the side of the receiver. I've got two of those but I don't recall where the ones I have are marked.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 12 Feb 2021 07:44
- Location: PA
Re: Couple of questions about a new to me 92
Well I worked on the rifle yesterday. It was pretty rough. Took a lot longer than I thought. It turned out pretty good in my opinion. Much smoother than it was. I had to remove some material from the ejector and lifter, clean up some burrs, shim the trigger spring and replace the ejector spring. Now I'm ready to take it to the range when the weather co-operates.
I did take a picture of the serial number and a lot of the parts. the parts are all stamped 607 except the buttstock which is stamped 351. Here is the SN:
I did take a picture of the serial number and a lot of the parts. the parts are all stamped 607 except the buttstock which is stamped 351. Here is the SN:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.